JFK ASSASSINATION ARGUMENTS
(PART 755)


ANTHONY MARSH SAID:

Of course there are 4 fragments in 1978 after Guinn had cut the original large fragment. .... It only became 4 fragments after Guinn handled them.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

If such a thing had happened, why wouldn't Dr. Guinn have said so? Why would he need to hide that information about innocently turning 3 fragments into 4?

Or do you think it was "innocently" done by Guinn? Was he part of the proverbial and never-ending "cover up" in this case too?

But if so, how would turning 3 [Connally wrist] fragments into 4 really make any difference? The weight of the fragments (in total) would still be the same whether the total number is 3 or 4 fragments.


ANTHONY MARSH SAID:

None of this really makes any difference to you. You just ASSuME and the facts be damned.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Irony Alert! (To borrow John McAdams' recently utilized phrase.)


ANTHONY MARSH SAID:

So what if CE399 was planted? At least it was fired from Oswald's rifle.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

Spoken as if I actually think 399 was "planted". (Nice touch there, Anthony.)

In actuality, common sense dictates that we turn Tony's silliness around --- Since CE399 is definitely a bullet from Oswald's rifle, that fact makes it much much LESS likely that 399 was "planted" (given the OTHER bullet evidence in the case which ALSO matches LHO's rifle, plus the very important fact that the FBI didn't even have Oswald's rifle in their possession until almost midnight on 11/22).

But in a CTer's mind, apparently CORROBORATION among many pieces of ballistics evidence in this case equals MANIPULATED/PLANTED EVIDENCE (and apparently, per the CTers, ALL of it was "manipulated" and/or "planted"). Crazy.


ANTHONY MARSH SAID:

So what if OJ's glove was planted? At least it was HIS glove.


DAVID VON PEIN SAID:

That's right, Tony. Like a good little conspiracy theorist, you'll just totally ignore those FOURTEEN Los Angeles police officers who all said there was only ONE glove at the Bundy crime scene BEFORE Mark Fuhrman ever even got to the murder scene.

Like in the JFK case, the O.J. Simpson case (if the CTers are to be believed) apparently also included a large number of plotters and cover-uppers in law enforcement who couldn't have cared less that the real killer got away. All they were concerned about was framing O.J. Simpson for two murders he never committed.

Now, Tony, be a good little CTer and tell me all about how O.J. was trying to frame HIMSELF when he said to Lange and Vannatter on 6/13/94 that he was dripping blood all over his car and property at almost the exact same time the two victims were being stabbed to death just a short distance from where Simpson was bleeding.

And don't forget to include Simpson's brilliant explanation of the razor-sharp cell phone.

David Von Pein
July 17, 2014
July 18, 2014